1. Homepage
  2. Exam
  3. [2022] UTS - 23509 Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation -Final Exam - Q1 -Regression

[2022] UTS - 23509 Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation -Final Exam - Q1 -Regression

This question has been solved
Engage in a Conversation

Question 1 (20 points)

It is often argued that investing in mass transport system is beneficial to citizens because reducing commuting time to workplace allows workers to spend more time on leisure. To study this, you collected data of Sydney residents on commuting time to workplace and expenditure on entertainment. Load the dataset using the following command: CourseNana.COM

• For Windows users: CourseNana.COM

dat = read.csv("C:/FinalExamData/12345678Question1Data.csv")

• For Mac Users: CourseNana.COM

dat = read.csv("~/FinalExamData/12345678Question1Data.csv")

Each observation in the dataset represents a worker. Variables in the dataset are: CourseNana.COM

• expenditure: monthly expenditure on entertainment, in Australian dollars CourseNana.COM

• time: commuting time to workplace, in hours CourseNana.COM

• pass: explained later CourseNana.COM

    
CourseNana.COM

(a) (3 points) Consider the regression: CourseNana.COM

expenditure =  a +   b * time + e. CourseNana.COM

  CourseNana.COM

Suggest a confounding factor that makes   not a causal effect of commuting time on expenditure on entertainment. CourseNana.COM

(b) (3 points) Suppose that City of Sydney gave a “Sydney motorway pass” to randomly chosen workers in Sydney, allowing pass holders to use motorways free of charge. Explain why it is a valid instrument for commuting time in the regression in (a). CourseNana.COM

(c) (3 points) In the dataset, the variable pass is equal to 1 if the individual received Sydney motorway pass and equal to 0 if not. Estimate the causal effect of commuting time on expenditure on entertainment using 2SLS. CourseNana.COM

(d) (2 points) According to the estimate in (c), what would be the expected change in expenditure on entertainment if the commuting time is reduced by 15 minutes (0.25 hour)? CourseNana.COM

(e) (2 points) Is the causal effect in (c) statistically significant at the 5% significance level? CourseNana.COM

(f) (2 points) Check if pass is a weak instrument. CourseNana.COM

(g) (2 points) Based on (c) and (e), conclude whether reduction in commuting time causes increase in expenditure on entertainment. CourseNana.COM

(h) (3 points) Suppose instead that City of Sydney gave a “Sydney experience pass” to randomly chosen workers in Sydney, which offers discounts to movie tickets in addition to what Sydney motorway pass offers. Explain why this is not a valid instrument for commuting time in the regression in (a). CourseNana.COM

CourseNana.COM

Get the Solution to This Question

WeChat WeChat
Whatsapp WhatsApp
UTS代写,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation代写,R lang代写,Regression代写,UTS代编,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation代编,R lang代编,Regression代编,UTS代考,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation代考,R lang代考,Regression代考,UTShelp,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluationhelp,R langhelp,Regressionhelp,UTS作业代写,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation作业代写,R lang作业代写,Regression作业代写,UTS编程代写,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluation编程代写,R lang编程代写,Regression编程代写,UTSprogramming help,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluationprogramming help,R langprogramming help,Regressionprogramming help,UTSassignment help,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluationassignment help,R langassignment help,Regressionassignment help,UTSsolution,Empirical Methods for Policy Evaluationsolution,R langsolution,Regressionsolution,